Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New
Review - Beyond Coincidence - Martin Plimmer & Brian King
There are three ways to write about fringe science, the intriguing possibilities at the edge of scientific knowledge that tends to infuriate the more po-faced scientists.
The first, typical of some tabloid newspapers, is pure acceptance. Someone says they saw something, so it happened. The second, beloved of many TV "documentaries" is pseudo-detachment, where you show some sign of realizing that there could be perfectly rational explanations of what is being covered - then plunge in and report the accounts without any attempt to test them or suggest alternative reasoning. Finally there's the true popular science sc/keptical approach. Ideally this still keeps an open mind - all too often, sadly, even otherwise very good scientists prejudge issues - but isn't swayed by hearsay and the all-too-faulty common sense.
This book, which could have been a solid type three, in fact adopts a broadly type two approach. Perhaps it's no coincidence (?!) that one of the authors is a fly-on-the-wall documentary maker. So what we get is a few chapters that mention the possibilities that coincidences are just that - and a shortish interview with mathematician Ian Stewart emphasising the contribution of probability - but at the same time, these introductory chapters are full of "but it still seems incredible" type of sentiments that totally undermine any rationality.
We then get about 200, taken at face value stories of coincidence. [My daughter would point out they even missed a coincidence in one story. One of the twins in a "separated at birth" story is called Tamara, just like one of the characters and actresses in the TV show "Sister, Sister" with an identical theme.] Now many of these stories are great fun (though they get a bit samey after a while) - and we all love telling about our own coincidences - but in the end the book doesn't succeed as popular science because it's all about second hand stories, not about accurate measurement and deduction. There's not enough analysis. It would have been much better to have had the top (say) 40 stories, and given a few people like Ian Stewart the chance to give them a context.
It's not a bad book - it is enjoyable light reading and coincidences are genuinely intriguing - but it could have been so much better.
Also in hardback (Amazon.com edition is hardback):
Reviewed by Peter Spitz
This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.
Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.
The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.
Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!
Part of the site
Copyright © Creativity
Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007