Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New

Review - The 4% Universe - Richard Panek


Visit bookshop

 

The 'four percent' in the title of this book refers to the apparently true but bizarre fact that only 4% of the universe seems to be ordinary stuff - from planets to stars - with twenty-odd percent of the remainder dark matter and the rest dark energy, the unknown phenomenon that is forcing the expansion of the universe to accelerate.

Don't come to this book hoping to find out what dark matter and dark energy are - because there's a long way to go before those questions can be definitively answered - but instead you will find an in-depth history of the process by which the (probable) existence of dark matter and dark energy were discovered.

Richard Panek is at his best when describing human beings in action, rather than covering the details of physics or cosmology. He really takes the reader in to experience the astronomers, astrophysicists and cosmologists (surprisingly different beasts) at work. We begin to understand how these people work, what drives them and what they really think. We also see that these really are human beings, particularly in the rivalry and at times downright antagonism between two teams, one primarily astronomers, the other primarily physicists, who were at the forefront of the discovery of dark energy in the late 1990s.

There are two problems with this approach, though. One is that we are dealing with quite a large cast, few of whom are given big enough parts to really stand out - so often the reader, for example, can forget which of the two camps a particular scientist belongs to. Although we get a real feeling of knowing a couple of the names, it does get a bit overwhelming. What also gets overwhelming is the depth Panek goes into with the detail of discovery.

There's a parallel here with the book A Grand and Bold Design, where Ann Finkbeiner goes into a lot of detail of what happened in the development of the Sloane Digital Sky Survey. Our reviewer loved it, but I have seen another review bemoaning the Finkbeiner's approach of covering ever little step. Similarly, if I'm honest, I got a touch bored with some of the trivia of discovery that Panek explored. The suspicion has to be that, having got access to detailed information from those involved, he was reluctant not to mention everything he heard - but this could have done with tighter editing.

The other problem with the focus on the people is that I'm not entirely sure that Panek always understands the science - there are one or two moments when he makes a statement that seems entirely wrong as far as the physics goes, but is swept away by the flow of the narrative so you don't really notice it. For example he tells us that the anthropic principle is the term for the idea that inflation implies that there are 10500 inflationary bubbles, each its own universe. First of all, inflation doesn't require this, it is just one possible implication, but secondly, the anthropic principle (which comes in two distinct forms) is not anything to do with inflation per se. It merely would explain why, if there were 10500 universes, we happened to live in this one.

A final niggle - the writing can be a touch pretentious. This doesn't come across when Panek is at his best, telling us the personal stories of scientists and their work. But when he tries to take the overview we get sentiments like '... the award ceremony at Cambridge wasn't only about posterity. It was about history, and history was something else. History was posterity in motion.' Groan.

Don't get me wrong. This is a great book for getting into the minds of those involved in these discoveries and for understanding more about how modern astronomy and cosmology works. I do recommend it. But the book's limitations are strong enough that they can't be entirely overlooked.

Paperback (US is hardback): also in Audio CD Visit bookshopVisit bookshop and MP3 CD Visit bookshopVisit bookshop

Review by Martin O'Brien

DISCLAIMERS

This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.

Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.

The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.

Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!

Part of the Popular Science  site

Copyright Creativity Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007