Popular Science Review

Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New

Review - Genome - Matt Ridley

The output of the human genome project is a heavy duty subject - just understanding what's involved in the process is not easy; interpreting the results operates at a whole different level. As for writing about the human genome in an accessible and enjoyable way - this is a particularly drastic challenge.

Ridley not only succeeds but does so in a rather cute fashion. This is 'an autobiography of a species in 23 chapters'. The number 23 is no random selection - it corresponds to the number of chromosome pairs we have, and Ridley picks out a gene to feature from each chromosome pair in each chapter.

This approach enables his book to be far reaching, looking at our relationship to other owners of the gene, from bacteria to great apes, spanning from the earliest forms of life to the genes that could be responsible for intelligence and language.

Evolutionary theory, biology's great triumph, is put across very effectively alongside good background material on genetics, and of the many books around the human genome, this has to be one of the best.

Particularly attractive is Ridley's style - effortlessly informative, yet light enough to almost always be enjoyable. If there's anything to criticize it is an over use of something to the effect of "to go through all of this would bore you to tears, but I just want to show you this little bit because..." - but that is a very minor moan.

This reviewer has a physics background and expects biology-based popular science to often be an necessary chore rather than a pleasure - this is a definite exception!

It's interesting to read it alongside Andrew Brown's In the Beginning was the Worm.

Also in hardback:

Reviewed by Brian Clegg

DISCLAIMERS

This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.

Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.

The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.

Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!

Part of the site