Popular Science Review - How to Clone the Perfect Blonde

Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New

Review - How to Clone the Perfect Blonde - Sue Nelson & Richard Hollingham

It's disappointing how close this is to a great popular science book. The premise is excellent. Subtitled 'making fantasises come true with cutting-edge science' it takes eight 'how to's and builds an interesting chapter around each. The title chapter, for example, is really about what cloning is, why it's difficult to do, what was special about Dolly the sheep, why the claims of various people to have made human clones already is unlikely and more. The other topics are:

how to build a domestic goddess (a humanoid robot)

how to avoid commuting (teleportation)

how to lose your love handles (dealing with fat)

how to turn back time (time machines)

how to upgrade your body (cyborgs)

how to remove an eyesore (black holes)

how to live for ever

... and each chapter has lots of good information put across in a very effective way. (The authors claim this is popular science for people who couldn't get past chapter 2 of Brief History of Time). But, and there is a but, it's all rather let down by the schoolboy/schoolgirl 'humour'. This isn't a book aimed at children, but the supposedly funny stuff grates after a while on an adult. To make matters worse, a lot of the humour would be lost on readers who haven't a UK background (which I suspect is why the book isn't available in the US). For instance in the cloning section, the 'recipe' for human cloning starts 'One human egg (check it's not past its sell-by date, and look for the lion mark)'. The lion mark? Even half the UK population probably can't remember that.

It's not that popular science can't be entertaining - the best certainly is - but we need to acknowledge that adults can cope with more sophisticated funnies.

Only in hardback.

Reviewed by Brian Clegg

DISCLAIMERS

This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.

Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.

The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.

Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!

Part of the site