Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New
Review - Schrödinger's Rabbits - Colin Bruce
It's perhaps the most joyous aspect of quantum theory (though it offends some and horrifies others) that it's possible to have a book like this that disagrees on most points with other excellent books in the quantum field like Marcus Chown's Quantum Zoo and Brian Clegg's The God Effect, yet it's hard to say that either side of the viewpoint is right or wrong.
Having said that, Colin Bruce come at quantum theory with near religious fervour in his support for the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum physics, to the extent that he seems inclined to bend the truth to match his beliefs. He tells us that the majority of physicists (or quantum physicists) support the many worlds interpretation - I really don't think this is true.
Where Bruce is very effective is in explaining how many worlds isn't just an interpretation that requires there to be a multiverse of parallel universes, but is a more subtle concept - in essence, according to Bruce, you are a many worlds supporter as soon as you accept the statement that a photon, passing through a Young's slits experiment, passes through both slits at once and interferes with itself. (Don't worry if this sounds faintly disgusting, it's not.) This makes his statement about supporters for many worlds more comprehensible.
In the end, though, the interpretation is just that, and most scientists get by without really worrying too much about it, just accepting that at the quantum level much that happens is inconceivable at a macro level. Where Bruce is a lot less successful is in putting across the aspects of quantum theory itself. For example, he uses a very complicated and confusing metaphor for quantum entanglement involving two sets of magic cards with 60 spots on that does nothing to help with explanation and plenty to leave the reader even more confused. In the end, the writing standard of this book isn't high enough to make it a good popular science title.
Also in hardback:
Reviewed by Martin O'Brien
This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.
Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.
The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.
Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!
Part of the site
Copyright © Creativity
Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007