Home Authors
Books
Subjects
Events
Software
Features
Links
Newsletter
Gifts
Blog
Write
Review What's New
Children's Books - age range 9 to 13*
Review - The Stunning Science of Everything
- Nick Arnold ![]()
|
|
Scholastic's Stunning Science series, mostly written by Nick Arnold and illustrated by Tony de Saulles, has been a remarkable success. The great thing about these books are that they appeal as much to individual children as they do to schools as educational books. They are as likely to be bought as a birthday present as for a science lesson. That's because they are one of the few examples of popular science for children (as opposed to textbooks, reference books or science picture books).
To celebrate the series, Scholastic has brought out this "science in one go" book - and it's a great attempt to cram a quick overview of everything you should know about science into 96 bulging pages. Perhaps the biggest triumph, given it is such an overview, is that the book remains very enjoyable and readable. There's little sense of rushing over things, just because it is condensed.
As usual with the Horrible Science books it's a crazy mix of cartoons and comic-style humour with facts and adventures in science. However, there is one break from tradition. Where one of the strengths of the Horrible Science books to date has been that they are ordinary paperbacks (hence both affordable and manageable), this one-off special has taken a leaf from Dorling Kindersley's "how to make a book" manual. It's large format, hardback and often adopts a DK-style, two pages to a topic approach. But a quick glance at it would inform anyone that this isn't one DK's lushly illustrated volumes, but the more anarchic (and dare we say fun) Horrible Science equivalent. In fact the weakest sections are where there are full page illustrations with a key - they lack the readability of the usual Horrible Science production.
While we're in mildly negative mode, let's get a few moans out of the way. We were a little surprised to learn that matter is like "frozen, cooled down energy" (so what temperature is energy, then?) And sad to see that de Saulles still hasn't got over his solar system model of the atom. There was a touch of inconsistency - we hear that we're all the same age because our matter dates back to the start of the universe, then we are told the oldest rock is 4.3 billion years old. So people are a lot older than rocks, then? It was a shame that Arnold misses out the really amazing thing about mitochondria. (No, we're not going to tell you.) And then there's the character Tinpot, a robot who lives to the end of the universe, slowly rusting away and being depressed, which might to older readers seem a touch reminiscent of Douglas Adams' Marvin, who at one point sits around to the end of the universe, slowing rusting away and being depressed...
... still these are minor gripes indeed. It's a great book as an introduction to all of science (okay, all except things like relativity and quantum theory and...), it keeps the interest and oozes with fun and horrid facts. The structure of starting with very small and working up very large works well. And young readers love it. What more could you ask?
Only in hardback.
Reviewed by Brian Clegg
Also available as 12 pack
and a 24 pack
.
* Our age range recommendation is an estimated guide, but individual readers outside the range could still enjoy the book!
DISCLAIMERS
This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.
Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.
The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.
Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!
Copyright © Creativity
Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007