Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New

Gift Review - New iPod Touch - Apple

Visit bookshop

I've never before rated an iPod above other MP3 players. They're really irritating, because they don't support Microsoft's WMA format, which means they have half the capacity of any other player. But the iPod Touch has won me over. It is just superb.

Its big, clear screen gives great visuals and sexy intuitive controls. The sound is excellent, and the ability to connect to a wireless internet means you can access the web from anywhere in the house (or a WiFi-enabled location like McDonalds).

Okay, it has a couple of limitations. I found the on-screen keyboard too small for my fingers, and because the screen is capacitative, you can't use a stylus, it has to be fingers. And there's still no WMA support, which means the cheapest touch can only take 2,000 songs. (Oh and you can't replace the battery yourself, which is poor design, and liable to illegal in Europe in a year or two.) But it's so lovely and fun to use. As long as you are young at heart (or just love a good gadget), nothing can do portable music better.

I'm sorry for sounding so gushing. I've always thought iPods were a triumph of style over substance, but the Touch is entirely a different matter.

If you desperately need more capacity, something cheaper or something smaller, the Creative Zen X-Fi is, without doubt, the next best thing - but try a Touch first. I defy you not to fall in love.

Also available in 16 Gb (4,000 songs):Visit bookshop Visit bookshop

Also available in 32 Gb (8,000 songs):Visit bookshop Visit bookshop

Gift category - special - costs around 160 for 8 Gb

Reviewed by Jo Reed

DISCLAIMERS

This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.

Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.

The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.

Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!

Part of the Popular Science  site

Copyright Creativity Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007